Amateurism is best for big ideas

You are currently viewing Amateurism is best for big ideas

It seems like certain ideas come across best if presented in old or friendly ways. Well, probably the best ideas, really, but I admit exceptions for high art.

I’m thinking these days of the C. S. Lewis stories, “The Chronicles

of Narnia.” And the Tolkien stories, too, why not.

All of these tales are told best, first of all, by way of

books—ideally, by way of lovely and specially bound editions, with

leather and gilt and paper that has texture to it and type that sinks

into the paper. This gives you the best possible feel for what’s

being said. Right?

Next best, do your dramatization—and show us what you’ve done by

way of the BBC, say.

The BBC did a TV series of the Narnia stories. Our kids and we check

em out and enjoy them greatly. The library kid says Hey, these are

great stories, not much for special effects, though. Well, I say, we

don’t mind, we just use our imagination. Works well enough. Best, in

fact.

The first Narnia story is a cute one, simple, but based on some good

old ideas. The BBC version of it does it justice. Probably anyone who

has a heart could. Who’s doing it because they love the story.

We went and saw the Hollywood version yesterday at the movie theater.

Sorry, Narnia just doesn’t work if you’re trying to make money off of

it. It’s a hard story to wreck, though, so it was all right. But

still. Kids who are really getting into the parts, who are acting as

simply as the simple original story, even if they’re carrying

cardboard shields and swords, are all it takes. Anything more

basically just detracts.

I’ve heard it said by Hollywood types that the new Narnia movie is a bit wooden or two-dimensional because “the original story is pretty simplistic.” Whups. Shows what they’ve been missing: life. It’s a clean, sparse, leanly written tale that packs a lot in. It has something to say. That isn’t trite or redundant. Hollywood can’t relate.

Then there are the accidentally obvious deep flaws, which are just

painful—it makes me cringe for our whole society to see how our

“best and brightest” only start coming on strong when they’re dealing

in torture and ugliness. Go for it, bossman! The Hollywood Narnia has

a simple air until we get to the villains and monsters—then we

start getting some, oooh!, DETAIL! Same thing happened with the

Tolkien movies. Yeah, go, go, Hollywood—go over the top with your

Evil. You only expose yourself in so doing. If that isn’t the most

obvious lesson of such things. I see this all the time in modern kid

movies—like Antz or Bug’s Life or The Lion King or whatever—the

evil villain is the clever smart one and we get to feel him turning

the screw more than anything else in the rest of the movie. Why?

Because the people who make these movies love hurting people more

than anything else. That’s why working in Hollywood comes so highly

recommended by people of sensitivity and cultivation. It’s a pity we

let them take it out on the kids, though.


Leave a Reply


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.